Jun 22 2006

Rivermark Part II

At long last, I will get to part II of my discussion of Rivermark. This time we are going to focus on the residential component of the development. My overiding comment on the residential component is WOW!

As previously mentioned, this development had three different national builders, with about 5 product lines. These included two series of townhomes, alley load cluster homes (detached single family), alley load single family, and front load single family. All of the product integrated extremely well together, with similar, yet distinct, architecture, colors, and materials. What I was really impressed with was how well they were able to pull off high density. For example, the alley load cluster homes (2-3 stories tall) all had front doors facing a common walkway. While the homes were only about 20 feet apart face to face, all the homes had front courtyards, a 3 foot tall courtyard wall, which lined the sidewalk, and perennials between the walls and the walk. In fact, landscaping was used extensively to help mitigate the effects of high density. Course, California also has the luxury of a huge plant pallete, and a year round growing season.

The homes were also pulled up close to the street, and the small front yards were well landscaped with an abundance of shrubs, roses, and perennials, with turf grass relegated to the parkway strips, and pocket parks. This is a lesson we can all learn. The traditional front lawn is a waste, not big enough to be useable, not really liveable, and it takes a lot of resources to keep alive; time, money, and water. I think we should pull all houses closer to the street, eliminate the lawns, and in the process make the streets more lively!

That is all for now, up next: Riverside commercial.


May 10 2006

Rivermark Part I

What first caught my eye on this project was the entry monument…and the commercial area! We were driving down the main street going past the community, heading off to meet some friends for dinner, when we went by, and my attention was immediately drawn to the commercial area. It was lively! It had color! It had interesting architecture! And there wasn’t a huge sea of parking in front of the stores…they were brought to the street!

Beyond that though, the whole community works together. There is unity in the overall design, the landscaping, colors, street furniture, and sight line vistas. There were 3 national builders of the residential component, with five total product lines. But all the home architecture, while varied, all read as a comprehensive whole. There are common elements throughout the community, most noticeably, the stone that was used in the landscaping, on the mailbox structures, and even some of the courtyard walls…it was all the same. The stone was even used within the commercial area, and on the entry monuments…all helping to pull the architecture together. Look at the picture I used in my overview blog of Rivermark, and you will see what I mean.

The site plan was very well thought out. There are several pocket parks, one for each general sub neighborhood, as well as a central community park. The varied product lines are integrated together. Sometimes product lines changed at the street with townhomes on one side of the street, and single family on the other. Sometimes it changed at alleys, and sometimes it changed across a connecting pedestrian way.


One key unifying element in the residential area were the mailboxes. These were actually designed to be a small gathering place with a trellis, usually benches were included, and always integrated into a pedestrian pathway or node. Forget the standard gray post office structure…make it an amenity.

The landscaping of this community was outstanding. Visually unappealing areas, such as alleys, were screened from pedestrian ways with vegetation. Shrub roses and perennials were used extensively. Turf grass was used sparingly, usually in bigger common areas. This created the illusion of a lush landscape that is actually very water thrifty…something we need to start doing in Colorado. The landscaping also helps to mask the density of this community. This is how you make high density work. Granted, this is California. They have the luxury of having plant material that will be green all year long…beyond Junipers. They also have a much bigger canvas of plant material to pick from that we do, but we can certainly borrow the ideas, and with the development of smaller and smarter plant material, we will be able to do the same thing.


Finally, this is a very pedestrian friendly community….without going into overkill mode. All street sidewalks were detached with parkway strips and street trees. Most people who know me know that I am a huge fan of detached sidewalks. I live in a community that has them, and I swear by them. The parkway strip creates just enough of a visual barrier, that the kids stay out of the streets! There are strong pedestrian connections uniting the primary park to the residential areas, and to the commercial area. I have included a picture looking down the street from a block of townhomes looking towards the commercial area. All the pedestrian connections tie together and to the street logically. But the didn’t get carried away. Within the commercial area, there weren’t any diagonal connections across the parking lot. You either followed the walks in front of the stores, or you walked through the parking lot. However, the parking lots themselves were fairly small by Colorado standards. I seriously doubt they had 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of commercial…but then, that will be covered later.

This should help paint the overall picture of Rivermark. Next time I will talk about the residential component in more detail.


May 10 2006

Rivermark Overview


For spring break my family and traveled to San Francisco to check out the sites, relax, and generally have a good time. One day we stumbled upon the new urbanism community of Rivermark. I had heard and read about this community before, but had forgotten about it. I am very glad we ran accross this community, as I found it to be one of the best examples of new urbanism planning I have ever seen. The got the commercial right, the residential was right, and the landscaping was awesome. What is even more impressive, this community was planned and built by a consortium of national builders: Centex Homes, Shea Homes, and Lennar Homes.

To fully talk about this community I will break it down into several different blogs:
Part I, overall community impact and first impression.
Part II, The residential
Part III, The commercial


May 1 2006

May “Uglies” Award


So I have been sitting and stewing on this one for awhile, ever since I first saw this church last Fall. As most of you know, I was born and raised in Grand Junction and so I go back there to visit my mom every once in awhile. We were cruising around one day, and my jaw about hit the floor when I saw this particular church.

Now I am not particularly religious in my beliefs (at least not organized religion), but I have always appreciated the beauty of churches, particularly the old fashioned corner churches. I have also appreciated what churches have stood for, a community gathering spot, and landmarks of the neighborhood within which they are located. People are usually proud of their churches, and take pride in the appearance of them. I am also keenly aware that churches (as with most everything in American culture) have gotten bigger over the years, and so it is harder to build them to a neighborhood scale.

But what about this church? It doesn’t even look remotely like a church….just a big metal box! Most of the bigger churches today still look like a church, though some people have complained that some look like office buildings. This church in particular doesn’t even look like an office building. It looks like a warehouse, and a bad one at that. Where is the pride in this church? It is just a boring box sitting in the middle of a parking lot. There isn’t even very much landscaping to soften the building, or screen the parking lot. How does this church relate to the surrounding neighborhood? Heck, how does this one relate to the community at large? To me, this structure looks more like a prison, not a very inviting place to go to for any reason.

What happened to churches being a part of and connected to the neighborhood? What happened to civic structures looking like a landmark? OK, this church might be a landmark, but not a positive one. And why on earth, would a city let a structure like this get built in the first place? Even in today’s throwaway society, buildings are usually built to last for decades, so this one will be around for a long time to come. Makes you wonder.


Apr 29 2006

Welcome!


Welcome to the inagural edition of “The Built Environment: Good, bad, and really ugly”. This blog is dedicating to my musings and views on the built environment, including, but not limited to planning, landscape architecture, architecture, and place making. My goal is to write about what makes a good place and a good built environment. I will show examples, and pictures. Of course, occasionally I will turn myself into a critic and write about something that I find that is really ugly. My intention is to focus more on new urbanist related projects, and those that do well at creating a sense of place and liveable communities. I also know, however, that new urbanism isn’t for everyone, so I will also write about those gems, or lack thereof, in the suburbs.

I am a landscape architect and planner by trade. My colleagues and myself design the neighborhoods you live in, the shopper centers you shop at, and the parks you play in. And yes, I know I can be a bit hypocritical, after all, I have clients that have their own wishes and desires. That, and I have to put food on the table too!

Anyway, we will see where this takes us! Enjoy, and post a comment if you wish!